Kiel,

New York Times: Two Climate Analysts Weigh the Notion of a ‘Good’ Path in the Anthropocene

Response to Clive Hamilton’s article. "Ethicist Clive Hamilton’s premise that seeing anything but catastrophe in an Anthropocene future is “un-scientific” is itself unscientific – a value judgment, not a statement of fact."

Link

Linked to: governance

« Go back

0 Comments

Add a comment

You need to be logged in to add comments.