20.05.2019

# New Publications

0 Comments

Herington, Jonathan (2019): Security, Planning and Justice. A Reply to Mintz-Woo

Herington, Jonathan (2019): Security, Planning and Justice. A Reply to Mintz-Woo. In Ethics, Policy & Environment 21 (3), pp. 387–390. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2018.1562531.

"In a recent paper (Herington, 2017), I argued that the mere risk of climate-related harm was itself a harm, since it undermined the security of individuals subject to that risk. In his commentary, Mintz-Woo (2019) argues that my account of the value of security is mistaken. On his view, the value of belief-relative security is already well captured by standard theories of wellbeing, and the value of fact-relative security is illusory. In the following, I attempt to respond to his concerns."

LINK


Read more »

20.05.2019

# New Publications

0 Comments

Mintz-Woo, Kian (2018): Security and Distribution, or Should You Care about Merely Possible Losses?

Mintz-Woo, Kian (2018): Security and Distribution, or Should You Care about Merely Possible Losses? In Ethics, Policy & Environment 21 (3), pp. 382–386. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2018.1562532.

"Jonathan Herington argues that harms can occur whether or not there is actually a loss. He claims that subjectively or objectively merely being at risk of losing access to basic goods is sufficient for lowering that individual’s well-being for the value of ‘security’. I challenge whether losing access to basic goods is sufficient to justify the introduction of this value. I also point to some issues in his interpretation of IPCC risk categories and the social science research he relies on."

LINK


Read more »

01.08.2017

# New Publications

0 Comments

Corry, Olaf (2017): The international politics of geoengineering. The feasibility of Plan B for tackling climate change

Corry, Olaf (2017): The international politics of geoengineering. The feasibility of Plan B for tackling climate change. In Security Dialogue 48 (4), pp. 297–315. DOI: 10.1177/0967010617704142.

"This article puts forward what it calls the ‘security hazard’ and argues that this could be a crucial factor in determining whether a technology is able, ultimately, to reduce climate risks. Ideas about global governance of geoengineering rely on heroic assumptions about state rationality and a generally pacific international system. Moreover, if in a climate engineered world weather events become something certain states can be made directly responsible for, this may also negatively affect prospects for ‘Plan A’, i.e. an effective global agreement on mitigation."

LINK


Read more »

19.09.2014

# Media

0 Comments

Risk Science Center: Designing global deliberation for geoengineering governance

"In sum, given the potential risks and benefits of geoengineering, and the growing citizen engagement (and activism) related to science and technology policymaking across the world, a deliberative approach is necessary."

Link


Read more »

16.03.2012

# New Publications

0 Comments

Lalonde, Karine; Mucci, Alfonso; et al. (2012): Preservation of organic matter in sediments promoted by iron

Lalonde, Karine; Mucci, Alfonso; Ouellet, Alexandre; Gélinas, Yves (2012): Preservation of organic matter in sediments promoted by iron. In: Nature 483 (7388), S. 198–200.

Paper on the effectiveness of maritime iron fertilization.

Link


Read more »

23.02.2012

# Media

0 Comments

Telegraph & Argus: Plan B is a dangerous exercise

General newspaper article.

Link


Read more »

21.01.2012

# Media

0 Comments

Brendon Bosworth Blog: Think Tank Urges Government to Start Geoengineering Research Program

Comprehensive overview over research and debate on CE with many links.

Link


Read more »

14.12.2011

# Media

0 Comments

Geoengineering Politics Blog: Post-Durban Wrap-Up

Informative summary and discussion of the Durban conference outcomes.

Link


Read more »