"Debate continues over whether geoengineering could prove a practicable way of averting the worst impacts of climate change. If it is to do so, a huge research effort will be needed – and who will regulate that?"

LINK

Mulligan, J., A. Rudee, K. Lebling, K. Levin, J. Anderson, and B. Christensen (2020): CarbonShot: Federal Policy Options for Carbon Removal in the United States. Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at www.wri.org/publication/carbonshot-federal-policyoptions-for-carbon-removal-in-the-united-states.

"The United States needs to make large-scale investments in carbon removal in the coming years if the country is to achieve carbon neutrality by midcentury."

LINK

"Done right, environmental review can reach what worries people most about climate engineering."

LINK

Matzner, Nils; Barben, Daniel (2020): Climate Engineering as a Communication Challenge: Contested Notions of Responsibility Across Expert Arenas of Science and Policy. SAGE Publications. Los Angeles, CA. Available online at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1075547019899408, updated on 1/29/2020.

"This article starts out from a notion of responsibility regarding subjects, objects, norms, and authorities. It will identify and analyze discursive patterns of responsibility across six expert arenas and provide a comparative mapping of these patterns. Better understanding controversy may help in finding common ground for designing research and policy strategies around CE. Taking on the challenges of communicating CE-related responsibilities would support CE governance."

LINK