02.06.2020

# Media

0 Comments

Phys.org: The human factor limits hope of climate fixes

"New research shows that when accounting for human behavior, climate engineering leads to significant economic and social risks. In a first-of-its-kind laboratory experiment, researchers found that both rational and irrational factors in the decision to fix the climate leads to welfare losses and increased inequality."

LINK


Read more »

01.06.2020

# Media

0 Comments

Gisborne Herald: What coronavirus teaches us about climate change

"A truly serious response to the climate threat will therefore come only when it is actually starting to hurt. Unfortunately, by then it will probably be too late."

LINK


Read more »

01.06.2020

# Media

0 Comments

Common Dreams: Global Groups Challenge Financial Sector to 'End Its Support for Fossil Fuels and Climate Chaos' Ahead of ExxonMobil Shareholders Meeting

'Ahead of oil and gas giant ExxonMobil's virtual annual shareholders meeting Wednesday morning, scores of international climate, human rights, faith, and Indigenous groups launched the Finance Climate Challenge, calling on the global financial sector to "end its support for fossil fuels and climate chaos."'

LINK


Read more »

15.04.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Carlisle, Daniel P.; et al. 2020: “The Public Remain Uninformed and Wary of Climate Engineering.”

Carlisle, Daniel P., Pamela M. Feetham, Malcolm J. Wright, and Damon A. H. Teagle. 2020: “The Public Remain Uninformed and Wary of Climate Engineering.” Climatic Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02706-5.

"‌New quantitative measurements of public perceptions for six climate engineering approaches show that the public of the United Kingdom (UK), United States (US), Australia (AU) and New Zealand (NZ) continue to have little knowledge of climate engineering."

LINK


Read more »

14.03.2020

# Media

0 Comments

The McGill Tribune: Geoengineering is a band-aid solution to the climate crisis

"The conversation around geoengineering, otherwise known as climate intervention or climate engineering, is gaining traction as climate projections remain dire. Offering many salient yet controversial ways to mitigate Earth’s rising temperatures, geoengineering methods include spraying sulphate particulates into the atmosphere to block out solar radiation, fertilizing the ocean with iron to capture more carbon, and injecting atmospheric carbon dioxide into rock deep beneath the Earth’s surface."

LINK


Read more »

12.01.2020

# Media

0 Comments

Podcast: WNYC: Geoengineering Climate Change, Tasmanian Tiger, New Water Plan. Jan 3, 2020, Part 1

"UCLA researcher Holly Buck is the author of a new book that examines these complexities. She explains to Ira why geoengineering could still be a valid strategy for buying time while we reduce emissions, and why any serious deployment of geoengineering technology would require a re-imagining of society as well."

LINK


Read more »

06.01.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Sugiyama, Masahiro; et al. (2020): The North–South Divide on Public Perceptions of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering?: A Survey in Six Asia-Pacific Countries

Sugiyama, Masahiro, Shinichiro Asayama, and Takanobu Kosugi (2020): The North–South Divide on Public Perceptions of Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering?: A Survey in Six Asia-Pacific Countries. Environmental Communication. January 3, 2020. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17524032.2019.1699137?journalCode=renc20&.

"The present study conducted an online survey of college students in six Asia-Pacific countries (Australia, China, India, Japan, the Philippines, and South Korea) about their attitudes toward stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, one of most discussed SRM proposals. Our results showed that students from the Global South (China, India, the Philippines) were more willing to accept geoengineering as a potential option than those from the Global North (Australia, Japan, and South Korea)."

LINK


Read more »

04.01.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Merk, Christine; et al. (2019): Public Perceptions of Climate Engineering: Laypersons’ Acceptance at Different Levels of Knowledge and Intensities of Deliberation

Merk, Christine, Geraldine Klaus, Julia Pohlers, Andreas Ernst, Konrad Ott, and Katrin Rehdanz (2019): Public Perceptions of Climate Engineering: Laypersons’ Acceptance at Different Levels of Knowledge and Intensities of Deliberation. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 28 (4): 348–55. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.4.6.

"‌We look at laypersons’ perceptions of BECCS and SAI at three stylized stages of increasing knowledge and deliberation. We found a high level of uncertainty among survey respondents as to whether to accept the use of these methods, which decreases when additional information is supplied by stakeholders."

LINK


Read more »

30.12.2019

# Media

0 Comments

The New York Times: In France, Holiday Skating Rinks Are an Unlikely Climate Battleground

"The attractions have prompted environmental concerns, and some cities have canceled them, citing the size of the carbon footprint needed to maintain the sites."

LINK


Read more »

30.12.2019

# Political Papers

0 Comments

Leiserowitz, A., et al. (2019): Climate change in the American mind: November 2019

Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Ballew, M., Goldberg, M., & Gustafson, A. (2019). Climate change in the American mind: November 2019. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.

"Our latest national survey finds that the highest percentage of Americans since our surveys began are “extremely” or “very” sure global warming is happening. Additionally, an increasing percentage of Americans understand that most scientists think global warming is happening. The report includes many other interesting findings, including how often Americans hear and talk about global warming."

LINK


Read more »