Meyer-Ohlendorf, Nils 2020: EU Framework for CO₂ Removals – Targets and Commitments. Berlin: Ecologic Institute.

"The new EU climate architecture should include a separate CDR target that builds primarily on restoring degraded ecosystems. This target should be legally binding and quantified – for the EU and Member States. It should not be a combined target which treats reductions and CDRs equally. This EU's CDR target should be enshrined in the European Climate Law."

LINK

"But discussion of carbon removal approaches must not be merely technical, but explicitly political. There are two reasons for this. First, the default approach to carbon removal under existing power structures both (a) risks further harm to frontline communities and ecosystems; and (b) probably won’t remove climate-significant amounts of carbon."

LINK

Möller, Ina. 2020: “Political Perspectives on Geoengineering: Navigating Problem Definition and Institutional Fit.” Global Environmental Politics (20/2). 

‌"This study provides an in-depth, theoretically informed analysis of the obstacles that policymakers face when addressing geoengineering governance."

LINK

Lockley, Andrew John, Yangyang Xu, and Simone Tilmes. 2020: “Politically Relevant Geoengineering Scenarios.” Earth and Space Science Open Archive. https://www.essoar.org/doi/10.1002/essoar.10502864.1.

"This paper discusses various scenarios, which appear to be broadly plausible from both a political and Earth-system standpoint. "

LINK