Möller, Ina. 2020: “Political Perspectives on Geoengineering: Navigating Problem Definition and Institutional Fit.” Global Environmental Politics (20/2). 

‌"This study provides an in-depth, theoretically informed analysis of the obstacles that policymakers face when addressing geoengineering governance."

LINK

"To make climate scenarios work for decision-makers, an international team of researchers developed a comprehensive interactive online platform. It is the first of its kind to provide the tools to use those scenarios—from climate impacts to mitigation and energy options—to a broader public beyond science. The scenarios help policy makers and businesses, finance actors and civil society alike to assess the threat of global warming and ways to limit it."

LINK

Talati, Shuchi, Robert James, and Wil Burns. 2020: “Once a Fringe Idea, Geoengineering Moves to Center Stage in Policy Arena.” Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C. Reprinted by permission from The Environmental Forum. 

"ELI convened a webinar bringing together three experts who collectively believe that it is time to consider at least two forms of geoengineering, solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal."

LINK

"Hidden in a $1.4 trillion spending bill passed by Congress last month, in a blink-and-you'll-miss-it paragraph, was a sizable provision to fund research to reverse climate change. No, not in a meaningful long-term way, by actually reducing our dependence on fossil fuels or reorganizing the economy to be based on need rather than consumption of disposable goods; rather, the research dollars were to be spent on programs that might allow our apocalyptic way of life to continue apace."

LINK