16.06.2021

# Media

0 Comments

The Global CO2 Initiative: Integrated Assessment

"To best guide decision makers, environmental, economic, and other opportunities and risks should ideally be analyzed together or at least in a coordinated manner. We describe approaches to conduct and interpret such assessments."

LINK


Read more »

28.04.2021

# New Publications

0 Comments

Grassi, Giacomo; et al. (2021): Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress

Grassi, Giacomo; Stehfest, Elke; Rogelj, Joeri; van Vuuren, Detlef; Cescatti, Alessandro; House, Jo et al. (2021): Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress. In Nat. Clim. Chang. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6.

"Here we present a ‘Rosetta stone’ adjustment to translate IAMs’ land-use mitigation pathways to estimates more comparable with GHG inventories."

LINK


Read more »

03.03.2021

# Media

0 Comments

NCAR: CCIS 2020 Webinar Series: Recordings

"Main Goals of the CCIS Webinar Series: Conceptualization of a research framework for assessing proposed climate intervention strategies: Establish shared understanding of ongoing research of climate intervention strategies in different research communities and main challenges. Reach a perspectival integration for completeness of knowledge/understanding. Identify elements of a research program, identify existing and new working groups of such a program."

LINK


Read more »

26.01.2021

# New Publications

0 Comments

Drake, Henri F.; et al. (2020): A Multi-control Climate Policy Process for a Designated Decision Maker

Drake, Henri F.; Rivest, Ronald L.; Edelman, Alan; Deutch, John (2020): A Multi-control Climate Policy Process for a Designated Decision Maker. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA (MIT CEEPR Working Paper Series).

"We present an idealized model of optimally-controlled climate change, which is complementary to simpler analytical models and more comprehensive Integrated Assessment Models. We show that the four methods of controlling climate damage– mitigation, carbon dioxide removal, adaptation, and solar radiation modification– are not interchangeable, as they enter at different stages of the causal chain that connects GHG emissions to climate damages."

LINK


Read more »

23.11.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Thoni, Terese; et al. (2020): Deployment of Negative Emissions Technologies at the National Level: A Need for Holistic Feasibility Assessments

Thoni, Terese; Beck, Silke; Borchers, Malgorzata; Förster, Johannes; Görl, Knut; Hahn, Alena et al. (2020): Deployment of Negative Emissions Technologies at the National Level: A Need for Holistic Feasibility Assessments. In Front. Clim. 2. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2020.590305.

"We examine 17 Long-Term Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Development Strategies (LT-LEDS), and discuss them in the context of available NETs feasibility assessments. Our mapping shows that most countries include NETs in their long-term strategies, and that enhancement of natural sinks is the most dominating type of NET in these strategies."

LINK


Read more »

27.10.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Johansson, Daniel J.A.; et al. (2020): The role of negative carbon emissions in reaching the Paris climate targets: The impact of target formulation in integrated assessment models

Johansson, Daniel J.A.; Azar, Christian; Lehtveer, Mariliis; Peters, Glen P. (2020): The role of negative carbon emissions in reaching the Paris climate targets: The impact of target formulation in integrated assessment models. In Environ. Res. Lett. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abc3f0.

"Across two Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), we found that the amount of net-negative emissions – when global net emissions fall below zero – depends to a large extent on how the target is represented, i.e. implemented in the model."

LINK


Read more »

09.09.2020

# Political Papers

0 Comments

Morrow, David (2020): Integrated Assessment Modeling of Carbon Removal at ICRLP

Morrow, David (2020): Integrated Assessment Modeling of Carbon Removal at ICRLP. Institute for Carbon Removal Law and Policy, September 2020. 

"The Institute for Carbon Removal Law and Policy is helping to push the boundaries of integrated assessment modeling of carbon removal with two ongoing projects."

LINK


Read more »

24.08.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Schweizer, Vanessa J.; et al. (2020): Integrated Climate-Change Assessment Scenarios and Carbon Dioxide Removal

Schweizer, Vanessa J.; Ebi, Kristie L.; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Jacoby, Henry D.; Riahi, Keywan; Strefler, Jessica et al. (2020): Integrated Climate-Change Assessment Scenarios and Carbon Dioxide Removal. In One Earth 3 (2), pp. 166–172. DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.001.

" This primer provides an overview of the purposes of scenarios in climate-change research and how they are used. It also introduces the integrated scenario framework and why it came about. CDR studies using the scenario framework, as well as its limitations, are discussed. Possible future developments for the scenario framework are highlighted, especially in relation to CDR."

LINK


Read more »

06.05.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Workman, Mark; et al. 2020: “Decision Making in Contexts of Deep Uncertainty - An Alternative Approach for Long-Term Climate Policy.”

Workman, Mark, Kate Dooley, Guy Lomax, James Maltby, and Geoff Darch. 2020: “Decision Making in Contexts of Deep Uncertainty - An Alternative Approach for Long-Term Climate Policy.” Environmental Science & Policy 103 (January 2020): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.002.

‌"Here, we critically examine both the use of BECCS in mitigation scenarios and the decision making philosophy underlying the use of integrated assessment modelling to inform climate policy."

LINK


Read more »

02.04.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Fuhrman, Jay; et al. 2019: “From Zero to Hero?: Why Integrated Assessment Modeling of Negative Emissions Technologies Is Hard and How We Can Do Better.”

Fuhrman, Jay, Haewon McJeon, Scott C. Doney, William Shobe, and Andres F. Clarens. 2019: “From Zero to Hero?: Why Integrated Assessment Modeling of Negative Emissions Technologies Is Hard and How We Can Do Better.” Frontiers in Climate 1 (December). https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2019.00011.

"Climate change mitigation strategies informed by Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) increasingly rely on major deployments of negative emissions technologies (NETs) to achieve global climate targets. Although NETs can strongly complement emissions mitigation efforts, this dependence on the presumed future ability to deploy NETs at scale raises questions about the structural elements of IAMs that are influencing our understanding of mitigation efforts."

‌LINK


Read more »