Mazo, Aaron (2016): The Technological Abyss: Heideggerian Ontology and Climate Change. In Earth Common Journal 6 (1). Available online at http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1559/the-technological-abyss-heideggerian-ontology-and-climate-change.

"Whenever a decision is made in a social, political, or economic context, it is implicitly grounded in an ethical outlook. But where do these outlooks come from? To investigate this query, I examine the basis for ethical decisions regarding technology, focusing specifically on geoengineering responses to climate change."

LINK

Galbraith, Jude (2021): Values in early-stage climate engineering: The ethical implications of "doing the research". In Studies in history and philosophy of science 86, pp. 103–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.01.009.

"I analyze the roles that can be played by nonepistemic political and ethical values in the design, tuning, and interpretation of climate models."

LINK

Lenzi, Dominic (2021): On the Permissibility (Or Otherwise) of Negative Emissions. In Ethics, Policy & Environment, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2021.1885249.

"While NETs are not risk-free, I argue that they could be part of minimally just responses to climate change. In doing so, I identify a dilemma between limiting warming to 1.5 ° C, which promises lower climate impacts but implies greater NETs risks, and 2°C, which requires less NETs but promises greater climate impacts. Finally, I consider what the case of NETs reveals about permissibility in the face of non-compliance with principles of climate justice."

LINK

"Main Goals of the CCIS Webinar Series: Conceptualization of a research framework for assessing proposed climate intervention strategies: Establish shared understanding of ongoing research of climate intervention strategies in different research communities and main challenges. Reach a perspectival integration for completeness of knowledge/understanding. Identify elements of a research program, identify existing and new working groups of such a program."

LINK