27.10.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Nelson, John P.; et al. (2020): Assessing solar geoengineering research funders: Insights from two US public deliberations

Nelson, John P.; Kaplan, Leah; Tomblin, David (2020): Assessing solar geoengineering research funders: Insights from two US public deliberations. In The Anthropocene Review, 205301962096484. DOI: 10.1177/2053019620964845.

"For both normative and pragmatic reasons, actors interested in SRM research and implementation would do well to attend to public preferences and concerns regarding SRM work. But despite growing literature treating public perspectives on SRM governance, little is known about public perceptions or preferences regarding potential SRM research funders. Specific research funders could significantly affect both the varieties, scales, and aims of research performed and public responses to SRM research. Drawing from two deliberative public forums on SRM research involving 171 participants in total, this paper begins to fill this gap in the literature."

LINK


Read more »

15.10.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Horton, Joshua B.; et al. (2020): Parametric Insurance for Solar Geoengineering: Insights from the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative

Horton, Joshua B.; Lefale, Penehuro; Keith, David (2020): Parametric Insurance for Solar Geoengineering: Insights from the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative. In Global Policy. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12864.

"Parametric insurance, which delivers payouts when specific physical indices (such as wind speed) cross predefined thresholds, was recently proposed by two of us as a compensation mechanism for SG with the potential to ease disagreements about the technology and to facilitate cooperative deployment; we refer to this proposal as reduced‐rate climate risk insurance for solar geoengineering, or ‘RCG’. Here we probe the plausibility of RCG by exploring the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative (PCRAFI), a sovereign risk pool providing parametric insurance coverage against tropical cyclones and earthquakes/tsunamis to Pacific island countries since 2013."

LINK


Read more »

22.09.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

Corbett, Charles R. (2020): "Extraordinary" and "Highly Controversial": Federal Research of Solar Geoengineering Under NEPA

Corbett, Charles R. (2020): "Extraordinary" and "Highly Controversial": Federal Research of Solar Geoengineering Under NEPA. (September 21, 2020). Northwestern University Law Review Online (forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3696942.

"This Essay argues that NOAA should use its discretion to conduct a programmatic environmental assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) as an initial step in complying with Congress’s mandate. Federal research into solar geoengineering is an extraordinary and highly controversial policy. The agency should carefully consider the environmental, social, and political impacts that may come with this undertaking. Further, the public deserves an opportunity to weigh in on the matter and to be appraised of its risks."

LINK


Read more »

21.09.2020

# Media

0 Comments

Knowable Magazine: Q&A — Climate scientist David Keith: Why solar geoengineering should be part of the climate crisis solution

"The controversial technology of reflecting sunlight away from the planet could help blunt the worst impacts of climate change."

LINK


Read more »

18.09.2020

# Calls & events

0 Comments

Call for Submissions: Special Issue "Resolving uncertainties in solar geoengineering through multi-model and large-ensemble simulations" (ACP/ESD inter-journal SI)

Deadline: 31. July 2022

"To capture the interrelated research amongst these projects, the special issue is set up jointly between Atmospheric Chemistry and Physicsand Earth System Dynamics. In ACP, we invite papers that emphasize process-level understanding and stratospheric dynamics; in ESD, submissions on Earth system effects, feedbacks, and impacts (like agriculture or ecosystem responses) are invited."

LINK


Read more »

24.08.2020

# Media

0 Comments

C2G: Guest post: Can solar geoengineering be democratically governed?

"Some commentators argue that the potential use of solar geoengineering would pose serious challenges to democratic forms of government and governance. At the extreme, they have argued that solar geoengineering and democracy would be simply incompatible."

LINK


Read more »

06.07.2020

# Media

0 Comments

Video: Clive Elsworth: Iron Salt Aerosol Presentation

"The presentation will briefly:

  • make the urgent case for Negative Emission Technologies,
  • explain how methane removal is the low hanging fruit,
  • explain how a very diffuse ISA application over a wide area of iron-poor ocean would additionally safely induce a continuous, climate-relevant absorption of CO2."

LINK


Read more »

01.07.2020

# Media

0 Comments

Harvard SGRP Blog: Ten Years of GeoMIP (Ben Kravitz)

"On this tenth anniversary, I thought it would be interesting to look back at that original GeoMIP paper and see how my thinking has evolved over the past decade."

LINK


Read more »

29.06.2020

# Political Papers

0 Comments

Union of Concerned Scientists: Issue Brief: Strengthening Public Input on Solar Geoengineering Research

"What’s needed for decisionmaking on atmospheric experiments."

LINK


Read more »

22.06.2020

# New Publications

0 Comments

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2020): Solar Geoengineering Research Governance

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2020): Solar Geoengineering Research Governance. Proceedings of a Workshop. With assistance of Steven Kendall, Anita Eisenstadt. Washington, D.C.

"On September 10-11, 2019, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Committee on Developing a Research Agenda and Research Governance Approaches for Climate Intervention Strategies That Reflect Sunlight to Cool Earth hosted a workshop to gather a broad array of information and perspectives on the governance of research for several solar geoengineering (SG) strategies."

LINK


Read more »