Media coverage of Parson/Keith: End the Deadlock on Governance of Geoengineering Research. [updated 21.03.]

Ricke, Katharine L.; Moreno-Cruz, Juan B.; Caldeira, Ken (2013): Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude broad participation. In: Environ. Res. Lett. 8 (1), pp. 14021.

Game-theoretical modeling of CE wins/losses. "Climate model simulations project a diversity of regional outcomes that vary with the amount of solar geoengineering deployed. It is unlikely that a single small actor could implement and sustain global-scale geoengineering that harms much of the world without intervention from harmed world powers."

Link

Scott, Karen N. (2013): International Law in the Anthropocene. Responding to the Geoengineering Challenge. (forthcoming). In: Michigan Journal of International Law, pp. 1–38.

"However, this article will argue that international environmental law not only refers to an area of international regulation, but also comprises a distinct set of norms and principles applicable to states in a situation where the global environment is at risk of serious or irreversible harm."

[no link available yet]

Abelkop, Adam D. K.; Carlson, Jonathan C. (2012): Reining in Phaëthon’s Chariot: Principles for the Governance of Geoengineering. In: University of Iowa - Legal Studies Research Paper 21 (27), pp. 101–145.

"This paper argues that there is an urgent need for the international community to establish a governance framework to control geoengineering experimentation and implementation. All proposals currently under discussion are likely to have some adverse, possibly severe, impacts on ecosystems or climate"

Link