01.04.2011

# New Publications

Comments

Goes, M., Keller, K., and Tuana, N. (2011), ‘The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering’

Goes, Marlos; Tuana, Nancy; Keller, Klaus (2011): The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering. In: Climatic Change 109 (3-4), pp. 719–744.

"Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are changing the Earth’s climate and impose substantial risks for current and future generations. What are scientifically sound, economically viable, and ethically defendable strategies to manage these climate risks? Ratified international agreements call for a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to avoid dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Recent proposals, however, call for a different approach: to geoengineer climate by injecting aerosol precursors into the stratosphere. [...]"

Link


Read more »

01.04.2011

# New Publications

Comments

Horton, J. B. (2011), ‘Geoengineering and the Myth of Unilateralism

Horton, J. B. (2011), ‘Geoengineering and the Myth of Unilateralism: Pressures and Prospects for International Cooperation’, Stanford Journal of Law, Science & Policy, IV: 56–69.

"In this article, I argue that fear of unilateralism is largely misplaced, grounded more in unexamined policy assumptions than in reasoned analysis of the strategic situation faced by states. I will present this argument in five parts. First, I will document the widespread notion that unilateral geoengineering poses a genuine threat to the international order. Second, I will closely examine the interests and constraints that are likely to confront states contemplating intervention in the climate system. Third, I will demonstrate that international dynamics are
more likely to create pressures leading to cooperation than to foster tendencies toward unilateralism. Fourth, I will consider different mechanisms for encouraging collaboration on climate intervention strategies. Finally, I will consider the implications of this argument for future discussions of geoengineering."


Read more »

01.04.2011

# Political Papers

0 Comments

Lane, Lee (2011): U.S. National Interest, Climate Engineering, and International Law

Lane, Lee (2011): U.S. National Interest, Climate Engineering, and International Law. Hudson Institute. Washington, D.C. (Economic Policy / Briefing Paper).

Short report on the U.S. potential interest in CE.

Link


Read more »

28.03.2011

# Media

Comments

REPORT: The Implications Of Geo-Engineering Schemes for New Zealand Conference 2011

Short report with links about a workshop on CE located in New Zealand. It used the 1000minds tool.


Read more »

10.03.2011

# Media

Comments

‘Die Welt will noch kein Geoengineering’

Schwefelimpfungen für die Atmosphäre, Eisendünger für die Meere und gigantische Spiegel für die Erdumlaufbahn: In Nagoya haben die UN-Länder ein Moratorium für umstrittene Geoengineering-Experimente beschlossen. Für Umweltschützer ein "Meilenstein".


Read more »

10.03.2011

# Political Papers

0 Comments

Geopiracy - The Case Against Geoengineering

A critical political report by the ETC group on Climate Engineering.

Link (Direct Download)


Read more »

24.02.2011

# New Publications

Comments

Betz, G., and Cacean, S. (2011), ‘The moral controversy about Climate Engineering. an argument map’

Betz, G., and Cacean, S. (2011), ‘The moral controversy about Climate Engineering. an argument map’, Version 2011-02-24 <http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/volltexte/1000022371>, updated 24 Feb 2011, accessed 4 Jul 2011.

Flow chart of arguments in the discours on Climate Engineering.


Read more »

04.02.2011

# New Publications

0 Comments

Hester, Tracy (2011): Remaking the World to Save it

Hester, Tracy (2011): Remaking the World to Save it: Applying U.S. Environmental Laws to Climate Engineering Projects (February 4, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1755203

Paper on legal regulation according to U.S. laws.

Link


Read more »

31.01.2011

# New Publications

Comments

Kravitz, B., Robock, A., Boucher, O. et al. (2011), ‘The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

Kravitz, B., Robock, A., Boucher, O. et al. (2011), ‘The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)’, Atmosph. Sci. Lett, 12/2: 162–167. DOI 10.1002/asl.316

"To evaluate the effects of stratospheric geoengineering with sulphate aerosols, we propose standard forcing scenarios to be applied to multiple climate models to compare their results and determine the robustness of their responses. Thus far, different modeling groups have used different forcing scenarios for both global warming and geoengineering, complicating the comparison of results. We recommend four experiments to explore the extent to which geoengineering might offset climate change projected in some of the Climate Model Intercomparison Project 5 experiments. These experiments focus on stratospheric aerosols, but future experiments under this framework may focus on different means of geoengineering."


Read more »

15.01.2011

# Media

0 Comments

Global Change: Climate geoengineering. Could we? Should we?

"Radical technological responses to counteract global warming are receiving increased attention as a possible policy option. But is geoengineering a potential safety net, a distraction or a dead end? Phil Williamson explores."

Link


Read more »