01.08.2011

# Political Papers

0 Comments

TAB (Hg.) (2011): TAB-Rundbrief. Schwerpunkt: Hope-, Hype- und Fear-Technologien

TAB (Hg.) (2011): TAB-Rundbrief. Schwerpunkt: Hope-, Hype- und Fear-Technologien. Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (39), zuletzt geprüft am 24.10.2011.

EN TA-Newsletter of the German Parliament with priority on CE.

DE Rundbrief des Technikfolgenabschätzungsbüros des Dt. Bundestages mit einen Schwerpunkt auf CE.

Link


Read more »

01.08.2011

# Political Papers

0 Comments

Understanding Risk Research Group: Public Engagement on Geoengineering Research: Preliminary Report on the SPICE Deliberative Workshops

"IAGP has three core objectives:
1) To evaluate the effectiveness and side effects of a broad range of geoengineering proposals
2) To evaluate the controllability of global climate using these proposals
3) To elicit and include stakeholder and public values into the evaluation"

Link


Read more »

04.07.2011

# New Publications

0 Comments

Reynolds, Jesse (2011): The Regulation of Climate Engineering

Reynolds, Jesse (2011): The Regulation of Climate Engineering. In: Law, Inn Tech 3 (1), S. 113–136.

Essay on (legal) regulation of CE and problems with specific CE methods.

Link


Read more »

01.07.2011

# New Publications

Comments

Uther, S., and Matzner, N. (2011), ‘Initiativen in der Climate-Engineering-Forschung. Projekte, Konferenzen, Netzwerke: Ein Bericht über ausgewählte Forschungsaktivitäten in Deutschland’

Uther, S., and Matzner, N. (2011), ‘Initiativen in der Climate-Engineering-Forschung. Projekte, Konferenzen, Netzwerke: Ein Bericht über ausgewählte Forschungsaktivitäten in Deutschland’, TATuP, 20/2: 94–98, accessed 28 Jul 2011.

EN  Report on selectet German research activities and the Summer School on Climate Engineering 2010.

DE  Bericht über deutsche Forschungsaktivitäten, insbesondere die Summer School 2010 in Heidelberg.


Read more »

01.07.2011

# New Publications

0 Comments

Bowerman, Niel; Kruger, Tim (2011): The Student Conference debate on geoengineering

Bowerman, Niel; Kruger, Tim (2011): The Student Conference debate on
geoengineering. In: Weather 66 (7), S. 184–185. DOI: 10.1002/wea.837

"This year’s Royal Meteorological Society Student Conference has just finished, and we look forward to contributions from it in due course. Here, two contributors to a debate held at last year’s Conference, Niel Bowerman and Tim Kruger, air their views on geoengineering as a possible means of tackling dangerous climate change."


Read more »

01.06.2011

# Political Papers

0 Comments

GEO-ENGINEERING, wirksamer Klimaschutz oder Größenwahn?: Methoden - Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen - Umweltpolitische Forderungen

EN  Critical report from the German Ministry of Environment on CE. See for English version of this report here.

DE  Kritischer Bericht des Umweltbundesamtes zu CE.

Link


Read more »

23.05.2011

# New Publications

0 Comments

Crutzen, Paul J.; Davis, Mike; et al. (Hg.) (2011): Das Raumschiff Erde hat keinen Notausgang (German Language)

Crutzen, Paul J.; Davis, Mike; Mastrandrea, Michael D.; Schneider, Stephen H.; Sloterdijk, Peter (Hg.) (2011): Das Raumschiff Erde hat keinen Notausgang. Energie und Politik im Anthropozän. Berlin: Suhrkamp (Edition Unseld : Sonderdruck).

On climate catastrophe and Anthropocene arguments.

Link


Read more »

15.05.2011

# New Publications

0 Comments

Allenby, Brad (2011): Geoengineering: A critique

Allenby, Brad (2011): Geoengineering: A critique. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology: IEEE, S. 1–5. DOI: 10.1109/ISSST.2011.5936870 

"Geoengineering is a technological response to the challenge of anthropogenic climate change and the failure of political mechanisms to achieve substantial progress in controlling atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Because it derives from the same policy framework as current global warming initiatives, it suffers from the same deficiencies. In particular, the geoengineering dialog to date fails to understand the full power of technology systems, and, because of its singleminded focus on global climate change, inadequately defines the class of technologies included in the geoengineering category."


Read more »

01.05.2011

# New Publications

0 Comments

Burns, William C. G. (2011): Climate Geoengineering: Solar Radiation Management and its Implications for Intergenerational Equity

Burns, William C. G. (2011): Climate Geoengineering: Solar Radiation Management and its Implications for Intergenerational Equity. In: Stanford Journal of Law, Science & Policy 4 (May 10), pp. 39–55.

"This article examines the implications of Solar Radiation Management climate geoengineering for intergenerational equity. It argues that under all but the most stringent circumstances, solar radiation management approaches would violate the internationally legally recognized principle of intergenerational equity."

Link


Read more »

01.05.2011

# New Publications

Comments

Humphreys, D. (2011), ‘Smoke and Mirrors: Some Reflections on the Science and Politics of Geoengineering’

Humphreys, D. (2011), ‘Smoke and Mirrors: Some Reflections on the Science and Politics of Geoengineering’, The Journal of Environment & Development, 20/2: 99–120.

"This article identifies and explores some of the political issues that will need to be addressed in the governance of geoengineering. It is argued that the diversity of different possible geoengineering techniques—encompassing solar radiation management (SRM) and carbon dioxide removal (CDR), and further divided into territorial techniques and commons-based techniques—rules out a single mode of geoengineering governance. Whereas some geoengineering techniques may be effective when implemented by a small number of countries, others would need to be implemented around the globe and involve most countries of the world, with different countries having different comparative advantages in the various geoengineering techniques. Such an enterprise would generate collective action problems related to implementation and disagreements over who should pay for the financial and nonfinancial costs of geoengineering. Nonetheless, a more coherent system of geoengineering governance is possible and is necessary if international conflict is to be avoided and the risks of unintended consequences are to be minimized. Any new international institutional design on geoengineering will need to address some pressing political and scientific questions, including the desired mean temperature of the world’s climate, the possible role of CDR technologies in carbon offsets and emissions-trading schemes, and whether there should be differentiated obligations between different groups of states."


Read more »